🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."